It 'funny how you look bored in this world always fanciful to request a conscience, now dormant taste.
often with recipes in bad taste.
In a television cookery is presented how to cook a cat.
A cat as a meal! The Cook stated candidly that it was a common practice in times of famine, though long gone from our memory.
The preparation of the dish in question was nothing more than a story about how to run. In saucepan, fortunately, there was the poor kitty.
There followed a storm of controversy, raised by animals, and that led to the dismissal the notch restaurateur, a type anzianotto whose white hair, of course, have no given wisdom.
seems to me though, even more odd that this chef has had the placet of production, the director, the Board of Examiners, which approves the scheduling of the episode.
's not so bad that an old man stoned face fucked up, but it is certainly indicative of widespread obtuse that a lot of people come back later.
you pay only the poor sclerotic seem simplistic compared to the chain of responsibility.
trivial and inelegant This made me reflect on the meaning of fairness and values \u200b\u200bthat we give to it.
The concept of Justice of the majority of people is a mystery to me.
Often the decision is unknown that is eating away at the subject more clear and never want to go beyond the surface.
It condemns the performer, at best, almost never the principal, let alone the supporters. These accomplices by their silence that opens the way to go would be impossible for the author of the reprehensible.
It is silent on so many who are silent.
In this way, we called out by a sense of personal responsibility that should really see us all always, to varying degrees, contributing cause of what happens.
Life is not presumed to know, I would paraphrase the well-known saying pettifogger, but I would not be too Manichean.
's why I do not think that a person in his heart to another judge, but I realize also that this society needs rules, limitations and areas of responsibility for finding solutions.
Ignoring or wanting to ignore the fact that every solution is always a trap.
I do not believe in the law, order and rules, "tout court", if not lived through the experience and shared by their feelings, certainly not complied with in respect to an abstract principle or a moral imperative to which to refer , anyway.
often with recipes in bad taste.
In a television cookery is presented how to cook a cat.
A cat as a meal! The Cook stated candidly that it was a common practice in times of famine, though long gone from our memory.
The preparation of the dish in question was nothing more than a story about how to run. In saucepan, fortunately, there was the poor kitty.
There followed a storm of controversy, raised by animals, and that led to the dismissal the notch restaurateur, a type anzianotto whose white hair, of course, have no given wisdom.
seems to me though, even more odd that this chef has had the placet of production, the director, the Board of Examiners, which approves the scheduling of the episode.
's not so bad that an old man stoned face fucked up, but it is certainly indicative of widespread obtuse that a lot of people come back later.
you pay only the poor sclerotic seem simplistic compared to the chain of responsibility.
trivial and inelegant This made me reflect on the meaning of fairness and values \u200b\u200bthat we give to it.
The concept of Justice of the majority of people is a mystery to me.
Often the decision is unknown that is eating away at the subject more clear and never want to go beyond the surface.
It condemns the performer, at best, almost never the principal, let alone the supporters. These accomplices by their silence that opens the way to go would be impossible for the author of the reprehensible.
It is silent on so many who are silent.
In this way, we called out by a sense of personal responsibility that should really see us all always, to varying degrees, contributing cause of what happens.
Life is not presumed to know, I would paraphrase the well-known saying pettifogger, but I would not be too Manichean.
's why I do not think that a person in his heart to another judge, but I realize also that this society needs rules, limitations and areas of responsibility for finding solutions.
Ignoring or wanting to ignore the fact that every solution is always a trap.
I do not believe in the law, order and rules, "tout court", if not lived through the experience and shared by their feelings, certainly not complied with in respect to an abstract principle or a moral imperative to which to refer , anyway.
Ultimately it is more honest and true to adhere to rules made for their experience and metabolised, as mentioned above, in her own life.
.
Once I was contradicting my friend on a matter that concerned him and that I agree, all this in front of others and he told me: "You've got to bear especially when I'm wrong! If I had reason I would not need a friend. " It may sound
this phrase but I did much thinking.
We are always asked to choose between the heart and mind, between codified rules and news and is never easy.
.
I think it is in our ability to react, to defend ourselves and maybe punish some one for a wrong (real or alleged to be) immediately. Rate
no, because the view is still a sword with double cut, while cracking the object of our size we judge.
If you have observed, when it rises within us the feedback that we can not agree with this finding. Rate
always creates a gap, first within ourselves.
I do not care to convince anyone, but it seems to me a fact, like gravity, the night after day, the rain that follows the weather.
We are still required to stand by the existence, to take a stand to say something.
It 's a paradox that must be reconciled with a wisdom that is not easy to achieve, I admit, but there's nothing else to do.
I do not think it makes sense to do more to life than this.
I also think that we can not judge because we can not know if they do not form part, subjective, often not free from prejudices.
As we can not "do" much for the same reason, we are not free to exercise a will free from the constraints of ourselves that give the appearance of this statue that egoic redundantly we call personality.
An anecdote.
One day a friend of mine talked about his "creations" art with an acquaintance of mine in Istanbul and they told us: "Do you know why it is forbidden in Islam to represent images of living beings? Why the Day (of Judgement) will be asked to give a soul to your images.
.
I think it is in our ability to react, to defend ourselves and maybe punish some one for a wrong (real or alleged to be) immediately. Rate
no, because the view is still a sword with double cut, while cracking the object of our size we judge.
If you have observed, when it rises within us the feedback that we can not agree with this finding. Rate
always creates a gap, first within ourselves.
I do not care to convince anyone, but it seems to me a fact, like gravity, the night after day, the rain that follows the weather.
We are still required to stand by the existence, to take a stand to say something.
It 's a paradox that must be reconciled with a wisdom that is not easy to achieve, I admit, but there's nothing else to do.
I do not think it makes sense to do more to life than this.
I also think that we can not judge because we can not know if they do not form part, subjective, often not free from prejudices.
As we can not "do" much for the same reason, we are not free to exercise a will free from the constraints of ourselves that give the appearance of this statue that egoic redundantly we call personality.
An anecdote.
One day a friend of mine talked about his "creations" art with an acquaintance of mine in Istanbul and they told us: "Do you know why it is forbidden in Islam to represent images of living beings? Why the Day (of Judgement) will be asked to give a soul to your images.
And you can not do it. Only God has the power to create. "
He alone (or whatever name you give to life or thought) can create, judge and know the end of everything. But this is of course another story ...
Just for the sake of chatting I add that Hell is just the man in him, especially when, arrogantly, takes possession of a law (the court) that does not deserve.
He alone (or whatever name you give to life or thought) can create, judge and know the end of everything. But this is of course another story ...
Just for the sake of chatting I add that Hell is just the man in him, especially when, arrogantly, takes possession of a law (the court) that does not deserve.
are just my personal opinions, but I think also that we are not the masters of this world.
We are guests and it is good manners to behave as such.
The body will return to earth, soul (if any) must be conquered first to be claimed as our ancestors before us.
They await us on the threshold of unrecycled, but we deserve the right to exceed this limit with Honor.
The body will return to earth, soul (if any) must be conquered first to be claimed as our ancestors before us.
They await us on the threshold of unrecycled, but we deserve the right to exceed this limit with Honor.
.
words that appear in this anachronistic and pronounces this subheading. In this so-called primitive man
separation between Ego and the Life was less evident. The animist cultures, in their apparent simplicity, they proposed a human being in a level playing field compared to plants, animals, the everything.
separation between Ego and the Life was less evident. The animist cultures, in their apparent simplicity, they proposed a human being in a level playing field compared to plants, animals, the everything.
These men lived (and I use the past because now I do not think that there are almost more) in a symbiotic relationship with Nature.
flowed in great mana, "sang" the reality that was created thanks to this, before them.
They did not live so the anxiety of separation from the world but leads us to do many stupid things.
For how much money, sex, one can think of owning property can not fill the void that underlies this break.
At least I see it.
Maybe they are frenzied words, but perhaps only because we have lost the reason.
I realize that we have lost the ability to perceive reality more spacious, with sizes that relate to co-exist in our present.
.
The echo of this song is old but it shows us a different life sounds a little inside us, just overwhelmed by the cacophony of meaningless questions.
The echo of this song is old but it shows us a different life sounds a little inside us, just overwhelmed by the cacophony of meaningless questions.
is not enough, however, grasp their meaning at the last minute. All
facing the abyss change, but may not be enough time.
Personally I try to hurry but slowly. About
of Justice was still a child when I witnessed on television the inauguration of the judiciary, the parade and ermine robes and listened to the keynote speech that sets out the same problems that I heard last year, the same annual celebration. I
But only in the past forty years.
I have often wondered why the so-called social problems are never the solution, perhaps simply because many of the problems do not become everyone's problems.
E 'very strange that the school, and all training systems tend to provide methods and concepts "to do" and never Systems "to be". We therefore studied
to know how to work and not knowing how to live.
Nobody, apart from some ancient esoteric schools, I think extinct, want to teach thinking, developing and directing the "best" way the logic of thought.
"Best" is not in a moral sense, but simply because more wider and deeper at the same time, free from those useless trappings of a misleading argument.
The Power of real or at least realistic vision of things is not developed, as is logical, starting with the simple act of removing from our mind those "thoughts parasites" that distorts our vision exactly, that ultimately allow us to be what do.
This is probably determined from an incorrect understanding, always in my humble opinion, we think we already know how to think.
There is therefore, on this basis, almost always a separation between what we do and what we are, and questoa thin and invisible boundary line stands a wall impassable between us and reality.
I remember a couple of illustrative stories that explain better what I think.
are two psychological experiments.
The first experiment was conducted over twenty years ago.
For a group of people and tell a story and asked the purpose of expressing an opinion. The story is simple.
A woman has a married lover who lives in another district of the city. This district is separated from the rest of the city and situated on a small peninsula surrounded by the sea, all communication with the mainland must transit through a single road that connects these two parts. We say that is an island connected to the rest of the metropolis.
As usual every week this woman goes by her lover and spend a few pleasant hours in the man's apartment.
But one day, when returning home, the lover with a childish excuse refuses to accompany her. Perhaps
does not love her anymore? Perhaps tired of this adulterous affair? He has another woman? These thoughts haunt the woman, but nevertheless decide not to investigate the matter and go home alone.
But first, the radio spread the news.
a dangerous murderess is around the city. The announcer, caution should be exercised until such time that the police (already on the trail of the offender) not arrested.
Despite this bad news, the woman leaves her lover to come home alone. At the bottom of her house is not so far away and lacks very little in the capture of dangerous criminals.
During her solitary return to the woman he realizes to be followed, however, worried about asking for help from a taxi driver to pass safely the only main road leading to his house, but he refuses.
The round is over and the taxi driver wants to return to his family for dinner and do not listen to reason.
Personally I try to hurry but slowly. About
of Justice was still a child when I witnessed on television the inauguration of the judiciary, the parade and ermine robes and listened to the keynote speech that sets out the same problems that I heard last year, the same annual celebration. I
But only in the past forty years.
I have often wondered why the so-called social problems are never the solution, perhaps simply because many of the problems do not become everyone's problems.
E 'very strange that the school, and all training systems tend to provide methods and concepts "to do" and never Systems "to be". We therefore studied
to know how to work and not knowing how to live.
Nobody, apart from some ancient esoteric schools, I think extinct, want to teach thinking, developing and directing the "best" way the logic of thought.
"Best" is not in a moral sense, but simply because more wider and deeper at the same time, free from those useless trappings of a misleading argument.
The Power of real or at least realistic vision of things is not developed, as is logical, starting with the simple act of removing from our mind those "thoughts parasites" that distorts our vision exactly, that ultimately allow us to be what do.
This is probably determined from an incorrect understanding, always in my humble opinion, we think we already know how to think.
There is therefore, on this basis, almost always a separation between what we do and what we are, and questoa thin and invisible boundary line stands a wall impassable between us and reality.
I remember a couple of illustrative stories that explain better what I think.
are two psychological experiments.
The first experiment was conducted over twenty years ago.
For a group of people and tell a story and asked the purpose of expressing an opinion. The story is simple.
A woman has a married lover who lives in another district of the city. This district is separated from the rest of the city and situated on a small peninsula surrounded by the sea, all communication with the mainland must transit through a single road that connects these two parts. We say that is an island connected to the rest of the metropolis.
As usual every week this woman goes by her lover and spend a few pleasant hours in the man's apartment.
But one day, when returning home, the lover with a childish excuse refuses to accompany her. Perhaps
does not love her anymore? Perhaps tired of this adulterous affair? He has another woman? These thoughts haunt the woman, but nevertheless decide not to investigate the matter and go home alone.
But first, the radio spread the news.
a dangerous murderess is around the city. The announcer, caution should be exercised until such time that the police (already on the trail of the offender) not arrested.
Despite this bad news, the woman leaves her lover to come home alone. At the bottom of her house is not so far away and lacks very little in the capture of dangerous criminals.
During her solitary return to the woman he realizes to be followed, however, worried about asking for help from a taxi driver to pass safely the only main road leading to his house, but he refuses.
The round is over and the taxi driver wants to return to his family for dinner and do not listen to reason.
The woman, discouraged, keep the feet crossed, but unfortunately meets murderess who turns out to be just that mysterious man who inevitably followed her and kills her.
espirme The group sampled in different percentages as to the responsibility of the event narrated.
Some blame the woman, faithless and reckless, while others blame the lover who has failed to protect the girl, Others even the taxi driver or the police has not done enough.
Only a small number to be the most logical answer is simple: the blame is the murderer.
The second experiment focuses equally on the sense of awareness and sense of justice.
E 'study appeared to be different that brings to light the way of reasoning that we use often in an automatic manner thus leading to paradoxical situations.
A group of volunteers is divided into two subgroups, one side becomes the "prisoners" and the other the "guards".
Prisoners have a fairly strict set of rules to be observed, while the guards need to ensure that these laws are complied with.
rules are sometimes irrational that regardless of any logic.
For example, the group of prisoners on a given day should do certain things and not others. Or dress in a certain way, maybe starting to walk again with the left foot and so on. etc..
Obviously, any time is revealed some infraction.
the guards and the explanation that because some prisoners have not followed the necessary rules and in any way apply sanctions, these punishments are only a deterrent to the order approved and are necessary for the success of the experiment.
This is how the need to punish and established a kind of little torture, by which a device and not seen by the prisoner, guilty of a violation is given a small electric shock to the victim. Just a little annoyed he is told.
Well, most of the group of "guards", without too much trouble administering the punishment, even if the subject of torture cries and complains that contradicted the organizers had assured that the device was almost harmless. In a minority
even the guards are witnessing the birth of a certain sadism, perhaps justified by the repeated violations of a particular prisoner in a "excaletion" vexatious without remorse.
The sense of responsibility is almost completely faded away with the excuse that they had "followed orders", or who heard the screams "seemed bogus," and so on, taking all sorts of reasons.
Only a small number expressed a rejection of this inhumane behavior.
to stay there if not shocked, "shocked" at our time.
How can hypnosis be vaccinated against this form of adaptation? How can I keep alive our critical and even more of our humanity?
espirme The group sampled in different percentages as to the responsibility of the event narrated.
Some blame the woman, faithless and reckless, while others blame the lover who has failed to protect the girl, Others even the taxi driver or the police has not done enough.
Only a small number to be the most logical answer is simple: the blame is the murderer.
The second experiment focuses equally on the sense of awareness and sense of justice.
E 'study appeared to be different that brings to light the way of reasoning that we use often in an automatic manner thus leading to paradoxical situations.
A group of volunteers is divided into two subgroups, one side becomes the "prisoners" and the other the "guards".
Prisoners have a fairly strict set of rules to be observed, while the guards need to ensure that these laws are complied with.
rules are sometimes irrational that regardless of any logic.
For example, the group of prisoners on a given day should do certain things and not others. Or dress in a certain way, maybe starting to walk again with the left foot and so on. etc..
Obviously, any time is revealed some infraction.
the guards and the explanation that because some prisoners have not followed the necessary rules and in any way apply sanctions, these punishments are only a deterrent to the order approved and are necessary for the success of the experiment.
This is how the need to punish and established a kind of little torture, by which a device and not seen by the prisoner, guilty of a violation is given a small electric shock to the victim. Just a little annoyed he is told.
Well, most of the group of "guards", without too much trouble administering the punishment, even if the subject of torture cries and complains that contradicted the organizers had assured that the device was almost harmless. In a minority
even the guards are witnessing the birth of a certain sadism, perhaps justified by the repeated violations of a particular prisoner in a "excaletion" vexatious without remorse.
The sense of responsibility is almost completely faded away with the excuse that they had "followed orders", or who heard the screams "seemed bogus," and so on, taking all sorts of reasons.
Only a small number expressed a rejection of this inhumane behavior.
to stay there if not shocked, "shocked" at our time.
How can hypnosis be vaccinated against this form of adaptation? How can I keep alive our critical and even more of our humanity?
Perhaps precooked solutions for this behavior is preferable to appeal to an example, for a story, indicating a stage of common sense, leaving them free to build it ourselves. It 's a story I read and that I find beautiful.
There was once an old monaco Japanese who lived in solitude in a remote mountain village. He was much loved by the people for his wisdom and for the speed with which he tried to help everyone.
There was once an old monaco Japanese who lived in solitude in a remote mountain village. He was much loved by the people for his wisdom and for the speed with which he tried to help everyone.
One day a village girl became pregnant, unmarried and not wanting to reveal to his parents, his father's name, kept the secret until the birth of the child. But after that, exacerbated by continuous interogatori of family and wanting to protect the real father of her son, blamed the fact the poor monaco.
was now a scandal.
The relatives of the girl, angry little baby they brought to the holy man who listened patiently and then insults the grievances of the group.
the only comment of a wise old man was simple: "Oh yeah?".
even more angry parents left the baby at Monaco because he occupied and left.
even more angry parents left the baby at Monaco because he occupied and left.
After a year in which the old lovingly bred the baby, suffering, however, the ostracism of the entire community, the truth came out.
The real father confessed to the crime and decided to marry the girl.
whole family plenty of time to resolve the situation came back from Monaco.
Needless to say, the question was followed by a lot of interest from curious people of the village.
Once the incident he apologized to the beautiful and better and then resumed the baby.
Once the incident he apologized to the beautiful and better and then resumed the baby.
The only comment the old man was still a simple: "Oh really?".
Touching issues here that should be touched in probably a more extensive discussion, perhaps over a bottle of good red wine.
Having also available the time not just to talk but also listen to the words and silences.
Touching issues here that should be touched in probably a more extensive discussion, perhaps over a bottle of good red wine.
Having also available the time not just to talk but also listen to the words and silences.
Is not the right place and it is not a question of right or wrong.
Not wanting to leave behind me any misunderstanding, I say only that they are two different things "judge" and "take a stand."
Not wanting to leave behind me any misunderstanding, I say only that they are two different things "judge" and "take a stand."
As written, we are necessarily called upon to say something about the existence and act otherwise would be like not to live.
That of which I speak is not a position of "Orientalist" or "feel-good" series: "Nobody can judge me ...", as she sang Caterina Caselli, or" Let it be, "to continue with the songs.
.
For example, if we want to understand and respond to a speech made by a person, you have to do to force a another little jump, otherwise let's just get some air to the teeth, there is no real communication.
For example, if we want to understand and respond to a speech made by a person, you have to do to force a another little jump, otherwise let's just get some air to the teeth, there is no real communication.
I want to say that that is the same way is the supremacy of ideas and personal perspectives that I find a hindrance in approaching the real.
not necessarily have to be to comply with a defeatist attitude towards the world, indeed ...
It 's a challenge, the challenge of reconciling a paradox.
.
For example in the struggle, perhaps even in comparison to the conflict, the individual is only at the end that includes the senselessness of this behavior.
Through the frustration of an action that proves the man can not make sense understand that projects always his discomfort on the other.
For example in the struggle, perhaps even in comparison to the conflict, the individual is only at the end that includes the senselessness of this behavior.
Through the frustration of an action that proves the man can not make sense understand that projects always his discomfort on the other.
If we hate, we hate ourselves in the end only.
That we are so stupid that we learn only errors.
.
rating on themselves then that occurs so easily in us is perhaps necessary, but also unnecessary and pointless.
I do not mean "self-observation", but "if the court", and as soon as they are very different things.
. Today
circumstances did they smile and you feel a great man, tomorrow the world is against you and you feel like a failure.
circumstances did they smile and you feel a great man, tomorrow the world is against you and you feel like a failure.
What kind of man can be called to judge his life if he lives at the mercy of confirmations?
What force, what dignity, what milestones reached such a person?
And perhaps not much to look like this little man? All
, so fragile in the face of life.
, so fragile in the face of life.
.
What we really blame if we do not find enough parking for the car to lose a good mood?
What exactly around us, everyone is going around with an outstretched hand looking for love and dell'applauso that makes us feel important.
.
What God can listen to a prayer of a being so insecure and yet so arrogant as to judge his fellow man and the world? How
What God can listen to a prayer of a being so insecure and yet so arrogant as to judge his fellow man and the world? How
important then to approach this simple: "Oh yeah?".
0 comments:
Post a Comment